The RoboDev Guideline: Key Requirements and Recommendations for Developing and Expanding Global Robotic Surgical Programmes

Authors

  • Anna Avrova Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Joshua Burke The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
  • James Glasbey Surgical Data Institute, University of Birmingham, UK
  • Aneel Bhangu Surgical Data Institute, University of Birmingham, UK
  • Eric E. Vinck Hospital Internacional de Colombia
  • Sunil Bhudia Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust
  • Somiah Siddiq University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Klaus Matzel Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Fiona C. Tsui-Fen Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
  • Emmelie Reynvoet AZ Jan Palfijn Gent
  • Kebebe Bekele Madda Walabu University Goba Referral Hospital
  • Vishal Soni Apollo Hospitals Ahmedabad
  • Mário Rino Real Instituto de Cirurgia Oncológica
  • Hatem Moussa American Hospital Dubai
  • Kaleem Ullah Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Bruno Martins University Hospital of Brasília
  • Guglielmo N. Piozzi Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
  • Jim Khan Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
  • Hanno Matthaei University Hospital Bonn
  • Nahid Gul Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Moumita Bag HCG NCHRI Cancer Centre, Nagpur
  • Shailesh Puntambekar Galaxy Care Hospital, Pune India
  • Hani Marcus University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Andrew Metcalfe University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
  • Akash Sharma The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Aime Mbonda National Social Insurance Fund Hospital
  • Guglielmo Mantica Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
  • Ankur Mandelia Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Maximilian Kückelhaus University Hospital Muenster
  • Antonio Toesca Candiolo Oncology Institute - Turin IRCCS
  • Joel Dunning South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Ricardo Buitrago Clinica de Marly in Bogota
  • Ben Challacombe Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust
  • Jaimin Bhatt Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow
  • Kaleab Michael Worabe Comprehensive Specialized Hospital
  • Vipin Tyagi Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
  • Saisriharsha Pakalapati Continental Hospitals, Hyderabad
  • Ashwin Mallya Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
  • Charudatta S. Bavare Houston Methodist Hospital
  • Fabien Thaveau CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
  • Antonio Ramos-De La Medina Hospital Español de Veracruz
  • Dhruva Ghosh Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana
  • Richard Crawford University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
  • Ismail Lawani University of Abomey Calavi
  • Deena Harji Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62463/surgery.282

Keywords:

robotic surgery, robotic, robotics, Delphi, RAS, robotic assisted surgery

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is expanding rapidly across surgical specialities, yet adoption across the globe remains variable. There is growing recognition to expand RAS across all healthcare settings, to ensure equity of access and improve clinical outcomes for all patients. Facilitating the expansion of RAS requires the development of high-quality, durable and sustainable RAS programmes. The aim of the RoboDev study was to develop a universal, globally applicable guideline to aid development and expansion of RAS programmes.

Methods: The RoboDev study was conducted as an international, multistakeholder Delphi process consisting of four phases: (1) scoping review and item generation, (2) questionnaire design and pre-testing, (3) accelerated two-round Delphi survey, and (4) consensus meetings. Participants were stratified by World Bank income classification. Recommendations achieving ≥80% agreement were retained. A subset of participants subsequently evaluated the final recommendations using the APEASE criteria (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Spill-over effects, and Equity).

Results: A total of 1,000 participants completed Round 1 and 812 completed Round 2 of the Delphi, representing HIC (59.5%), UMIC (16.6%), LMIC (18.7%), and LIC (1.6%) stakeholders. From 245 initial statements across eight domains, 194 recommendations achieved global consensus. Tailored adaptations were added for each income group, resulting in 197 recommendations for HICs, 207 for UMICs, 206 for LMICs, and 216 for LICs. Training, infrastructure readiness, and multidisciplinary engagement showed the greatest variation across settings. APEASE evaluation confirmed overall acceptability, practicality, and equity, with LIC participants reporting the highest spill-over and equity benefits.

Conclusion: The RoboDev study has developed the first global, evidence-based, and context-sensitive guidelines for building and expanding robot-assisted surgical programmes. By combining universal principles with context-specific adaptations, these recommendations provide a roadmap for equitable and sustainable expansion of robotic surgery worldwide. Adoption of these guidelines has the potential to improve patient outcomes, strengthen surgical systems and ensure that the benefits of robotic innovation are shared equitably across all global contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2025

How to Cite

Avrova, A., Burke, J., Glasbey, J., Bhangu, A., Vinck, E. E., Bhudia, S., … Harji, D. (2025). The RoboDev Guideline: Key Requirements and Recommendations for Developing and Expanding Global Robotic Surgical Programmes . Impact Surgery, 2(7), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.62463/surgery.282

Issue

Section

Original research paper