Global access and safety of robotic-assisted surgery for inguinal hernia and gallstone disease worldwide: A pooled multinational cohort study across 110 countries.

Authors

  • Dhanya Nantha Kumar North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • John Buchanan The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
  • Adewale Adisa Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital
  • Arda Isik Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC
  • Marie Carmela Lapitan University of the Philippines
  • Richard Evans University Hospital of North Midlands
  • Ewen M Harrison University of Edinburgh
  • Ewen A Griffiths Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Maria Picciochi University of Birmingham
  • Parvez Haque Christian Medical College and hospital Ludhiana
  • Aneel Bhangu University of Birmingham
  • Sivesh K Kamarajah University of Birmingham

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62463/surgery.294

Keywords:

robotic assisted surgery, Inguinal hernia, cholecystectomy, Global surgery, Low- and Middle-Income Countries, high-income countries

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is rapidly expanding for common surgical procedures worldwide. This study aimed to measure global access and safety of this technology in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair and cholecystectomy.

Methods: This analysis included patients undergoing cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia from two contemporary global prospective cohort studies (GECKO, n=52,163; HIPPO, n=18,041). Hierarchical multilevel logistic regression models were used to quantify associations between operative approach (open, laparoscopy, RAS, minimally invasive converted to open) and surgical safety, measured by 30-day postoperative complications, adjusting for hospital, patient, and operative-level factors.

Results: This study included 70,204 patients across 110 countries of whom 857 (1.2%) underwent RAS (high income, n=807; upper middle income, n=17; lower-middle or low income, n=33). Of RAS performed in high income countries, 480 (59.5%) were in the USA and 120 (14.9%) were in the United Kingdom. The overall 30-day complications were 15.0%, similar in patients undergoing laparoscopy (13.8%) and RAS (13.1%), but higher in open (16.8%) or minimally invasive converted to open (42.3%). In adjusted analysis compared to laparoscopy, there were no significant difference in 30-day complications with RAS (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.56). However, open (2.56, 2.28-2.88) and minimally invasive converted to open surgery (3.92, 3.43-4.48) were associated with significantly higher 30-day complications.

Conclusion: Early phase implementation of robotic surgery for simple surgical procedures appears safe but is concentrated in wealthier settings. Avoiding conversion from minimally invasive surgery to open surgery requires careful patient selection. Future research should focus on wider health systems evaluation including productivity, equity of adoption, and cost-effectiveness of simple procedures within the lens of a whole robotic system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

30-11-2025

How to Cite

Nantha Kumar, D., Buchanan, J., Adisa, A., Isik, A., Lapitan, M. C., Evans, R., … Kamarajah, S. K. (2025). Global access and safety of robotic-assisted surgery for inguinal hernia and gallstone disease worldwide: A pooled multinational cohort study across 110 countries . Impact Surgery, 2(7), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.62463/surgery.294

Issue

Section

Original research paper